- #Windows home server 2011 pricing android
- #Windows home server 2011 pricing Pc
- #Windows home server 2011 pricing plus
#Windows home server 2011 pricing Pc
What Microsoft could have done is said: Here is Windows you can download for a USB flash drive that turns an old PC or laptop into a storage server with a bunch of features.
![windows home server 2011 pricing windows home server 2011 pricing](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ef/c5/8e/efc58e5342d7a78b1472123109e1eb2c.jpg)
If one recalls to the early days of WHS, it was only available by purchasing a system from an OEM partner. Reason #7: The business model was flawed. Microsoft released Windows Home Server, but failed to keep adding new features. Home users are accustomed to this type of constant innovation. Menus are better, new functionality is added, and etc.
#Windows home server 2011 pricing android
Reason #6: Where was feature development? If you look at mobile these days, there is constant innovation in features being offered with every iOS and Android launch. Why make another SKU? With no unique features over the new standard Windows installation, and with anything one wanted to add being available through standard Windows software, what could Windows Home Server offer… that brings me to reason #6. Reason #5: With Storage Spaces, and basically Drive Extender V2 pre-installed with Windows 8, what else did Windows Home Server have to offer? Windows 8 is the new Windows Home Server because the feature dilution was too bad. If a backup is needed, might as well use Storage Spaces. Microsoft has the correct idea basically using all computers on the home network as potential storage devices. Reason #4: Low-end shared storage is going away. Microsoft needs to rely upon more than simply the fact that it is a Windows machine because users are not used to having a PC sitting around that nobody uses as a workstation. If you look at Google or Apple, they try to introduce products that integrate with the rest of their ecosystems.
#Windows home server 2011 pricing plus
Here’s a cool use idea: Use an old PC or one from our OEM partners as your WHS and get Office for the entire family plus a redundant space for computer back-ups, purchased media, important shared file storage and etc. I have absolutely no idea, other than organizational pressures, why Microsoft never made an attempt to do things such as Zune tie-ins and application virtualization/ site licensing. Reason #3: Microsoft did not tie the product into its ecosystem. 4-5 drive max capacity left OEM partners competing against the low-end Linux offerings yet requiring the overhead of Windows both in terms of hardware requirements and expense. HP did a good job adding some custom functionality, but here is the thing, offerings were weak. Reason #2: OEM partners had weak offerings. When did you ever see Microsoft put out months worth of cool use-cases for WHS on YouTube? Sure there was some effort, but low marketing budget with no evangelist failed to solve a problem. It relied upon its OEM partners to generate buzz. Here is the issue, Microsoft never pushed any features from WHS seriously. Reason #1: Microsoft failed on evangelizing the platform. Here are my thoughts on why Windows Home Server is headed to extinction. Personally, I still have a production Windows Home Server V1 machine running, but only ended up implementing a test system for Windows Home Server 2011. I actually think this makes a lot of sense, as I always felt that once the new drive extender technology was removed from Windows Home Server 2011 the product line was essentially doomed.
![windows home server 2011 pricing windows home server 2011 pricing](https://socket3.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/winhomeserver-1.png)
Recently Microsoft announced that Windows Home Server will not see another version and is effectively discontinued.